Friday, March 29, 2013

Love it, or Leave it?



“If you’re so at odds with traditional Christian theology, why don’t you just plug in somewhere else?” a friend recently asked. 
Well, it would be a bit like divorce from a lifelong mate.  As with a long standing marriage, there’ve been ups and downs, but it’s been a very loving relationship, and if I left it, I really don’t know what I could find to replace it.  But, most important for me is the call I feel to be instrumental in helping the church rediscover its faith roots, planted in the example and teachings of the one it proclaims as Lord.  Beyond that, I’m not persuaded that 21st Century Christianity, in all its varied iterations, authentically and fully expresses the theology of Jesus. 
For most of my adult life I have been trying to clarify and reconcile my spirituality with understandings passed on to me by my parents and other teachers within my traditional Christian faith community.  This has become increasingly difficult as my own life experiences have confronted me with an irresolvable conflict between what I was taught and what I can accept as valid for me.  My church has not encouraged me in my need to pursue a more expansive world view that helps me to see more completely my interdependent relationship with all of humankind.  I have remained in my faith community with the hope that I might be a guiding light to others who express openness to more expansive understandings of life, unconstrained by sectarian dogma and traditional faith perspectives, striving to be agents of reconciliation in a destructively divided world.  I have justified my chosen role from a personal perspective of the function of and continuing need for reformation within the church, and an evolving spirituality within myself and my faith community.  
The closest thing I can find from Jesus that might serve as a litmus test for Christian discipleship would be the practice of servanthood as spoken of in Matthew 25, and loving neighbor without reservation (Golden Rule living), which I understand is affirmed in somewhat similar expression by virtually all major world faiths.  Although certain Biblical references may seem to suggest otherwise, I do not perceive Jesus as prescribing a particular belief system or identifying himself as the antidote to an eternal existence of relentless suffering in a state of separation from God.  I see him as the premier characterization of the wholeness within which all humankind can indeed experience shalom peace, and so I seek to become like him to the extent that I am able to transcend my human frailties.
I do not believe it is possible for me to truly love my neighbor and view my neighbor’s experience of God, however defined, as insufficient or invalid.  The United Methodist mission to “make disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world” suggests that Christian discipleship is the antidote to the human condition, and that my task as a Christian is to persuade my neighbor to become a Christian disciple, and thus also an agent of transformation in the world.  There seems to be at least a suggestion here that other historic faith communities do not have the capacity to be agents of love, peace, and reconciliation, to live with concern for neighbor at least equal to concern for self.  As I learn more about other faiths, I have to reject this notion.
I have come to believe that spiritual maturity is not the attainment of certainty about anything, rather the realization that there are no final answers for humans and that maturity is better reflected in the search, the questions, the recognition that things eternal cannot be packaged in a doctrine, a book, or a theological treatise.  It seems to me that attempts to package can be a form of idolatry, lead to spiritual arrogance and bigotry, and are not inherently a means to Grace or a coming Kingdom of God in human hearts.  Finding the freedoms that exist beyond the bindings requires a conscious and intentional effort to put behind us beliefs that fall short of serving humanity well, acknowledge our interdependence and mutuality, and live as though our lives and the survival of our world depend on it.
In my still forming view, western Christianity’s capacity for transformation has been severely compromised by its cohabitation with secular culture, with the Christian community dependent on secular culture for its survival, and secular culture appropriating Christianity for its utility.  Despite dissenting voices within the church, some mercilessly quieted, the bond seems to have strengthened over the centuries.  But this identifies even more clearly for me my task to be an agent of change.
And so, as long as I can be a positive influence for change within my spiritual community that enables people to minimize their separation from their creator, my pilgrimage with them will continue.
Do you have a similar story?  If so, I hope you’ll share it.